E. Jean Carroll's defamation case against Trump primarily relies on an alleged dress that she claims was the one he sexually assaulted her in back in the early 1990s in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room. However, a significant issue arises – the dress did not even exist at the time Carroll alleges she was attacked by Trump, which his attorney recently pointed out.
HUGE! New York Magazine’s Guessing Game – E. Jean Carroll Jacket Dress Comes into Question – Trump Accuser Stumbles During Testimony via @gatewaypundit https://t.co/xq6U8lSf6H
— The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) January 20, 2024
From Breitbart:
Carroll’s second defamation trial against Trump is underway. Notably, Trump is not facing criminal charges in these cases. Carroll first went public with her story in 2019, posing for a cover of New York Magazine in the Donna Karan blazer dress that she claims she was assaulted in. However, it turns out the dress was not even available the original year that she claimed the attack happened.
Trump Attorney Boris Epshteyn told reporters, “She said, this is the dress I wore in 1994. They went back, they checked. The dress wasn’t even made in 1994.”
“And that’s why the date’s moved around. This is the 80s. Is it the 90s? Is it the 2000s? President Trump has consistently stated that he was falsely accused and he has the right to defend himself,” he added:
Trump added that “E. Jean Carroll was forced to change her story on the ‘Monica Lewinsky-type’ dress.”
“She originally claimed that the ‘event’ happened in 1994, and that she wore the Donna Karan dress on that day. The problem is that New York Times Fact Checkers found the dress wasn’t even made by Donna Karan until long after 1994,” Trump said on Truth Social.
It's pretty hilarious how this supposed validating dress for an already feeble story is unraveling faster than an old pair of pantyhose.
The liberal media attempted to spin the entire E. Jean Carroll case as reminiscent of Monica Lewinsky and her notorious blue dress. Unfortunately for them, this narrative doesn't even come close to the scandal that nearly brought down President Clinton.
